The absurdity, however, did not obscure that significant first great achievement of Rostworowski. The opinion of the jury express in the technical report that its members wrote, and through which the reasons consider for awarding the prize are record, highlighting the value and originality of the work creat by Rostworowski, has been record. There, in addition, some emotional lines are dicat to drawing attention to the expectant place that in the jury’s opinion the researcher was already occupying in the context of historical research in our country: «With justice as well as with a loyal spirit of encouragement It can be said that a new Peruvian authority in Inca history has emerg” (Porras, Moreyra and Tauro, 2006, p.
Novel Jakob Wassermann
These words, with great success of course, announc the glimpse of an auspicious work that would find resounding fruition in the following years. The publication of another book of his, which was about the daughter of the conqueror of Peru, entitl Doña Francisca business database Pizarro. An illustrious mestiza. 1534-1598 , not only meant an important contribution –one more– to the national historical heritage, but also, in 2003, it would give rise to a mortifying circumstance for its author. Álvaro Vargas Llosa, according to Rostworowski, had plagiariz information from his book to write a fictionaliz biography on the same topic.
Expresses a Bitter
But the decision had to be confirm and made official by a government body. In a dishonest maneuver, the government authorities rectifi the jury’s decision and award the award to the historian and magistrate Luis Antonio ASB Directory Eguiguren Escudero, at the time President of the Supreme Court of Justice – undoubtly a renown researcher, whose work, however, , did not have the necessary merits to win the award – with whom the regime sought to ingratiate itself in the context of a judicial dispute it had with a commercial company.
